Analysis of the Return of Evidence 220 to 258 in Decision Number 1240/Pid.sus/2022/PN.Tng With the Defendant Indra Kusuma or Indra Kenz (Perspective of the Principles of Justice, Benefit, and Al-Maslahah)

On August 14, 2022 the judge at Tangerang district court stated that defendant Indra Kusuma or Kenz had spread false news which resulted in consumer losses electronic transactions and money laundering, sentenced to 10 years imprisonment a fine of billion, provided if sentence is not paid, it will be replaced with confinement for 2 months, so on. Interestingly, this decision disagreed public prosecutor regarding return evidence number 220-254 victim-witness through United Indonesian Traders Association because goods were result crime. Therefore purpose study analyze aspectsal-'is (justice) andal-maslahah(benefits) viewed from side victim accused. This research normative juridical approach. uses secondary legal materials form decisions 1240/Pid.sus/2022/PN.Tng, related laws, theories, theoriesal-'is, theoryproblem. The results show judge's refusal 220-258 violates principles certainty, expediency benefit Islamic law. researcher's solution should select belongs victim.